This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: [PATCH, ARM] New CPU support for Marvell PJ4 cores
Updated changelog.
* config/arm/marvell-pj4.md: New marvell-pj4 pipeline description.
* config/arm/arm.c (arm_issue_rate): Add marvell_pj4.
* config/arm/arm.md (tune_marvell): Add marvell_pj4.
* config/arm/arm-cores.def: Add core marvell-pj4.
* config/arm/arm-tune.md: Regenerated.
* config/arm/arm-tables.opt: Regenerated.
* config/arm/bpabi.h (BE8_LINK_SPEC): Add marvell_pj4.
* doc/invoke.texi: Added entry for marvell-pj4.
B.R.
Yi-Hsiu, Hsu
-----Original Message-----
From: Ramana Radhakrishnan [mailto:ramana.radhakrishnan@linaro.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 3:36 AM
To: Yi-Hsiu Hsu
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, ARM] New CPU support for Marvell PJ4 cores
On 20 June 2012 03:53, Yi-Hsiu Hsu <ahsu@marvell.com> wrote:
> marvell-pj4 is added to BE8_LINK_SPEC.
>
> Modified patch is attached.
Missing a modified changelog entry.
Ramana
>
> Thanks!
>
> B.R.
> Yi-Hsiu, Hsu
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ramana Radhakrishnan [mailto:ramana.radhakrishnan@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 2:19 AM
> To: Yi-Hsiu Hsu
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH, ARM] New CPU support for Marvell PJ4 cores
>
> On 29 May 2012 10:07, Yi-Hsiu Hsu <ahsu@marvell.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch maintains Marvell PJ4 cores pipeline description.
>> Run arm testsuite on arm-linux-gnueabi and no extra regressions are found.
>>
>> ? ? ? ?* config/arm/marvell-pj4.md: New marvell-pj4 pipeline description.
>> ? ? ? ?* config/arm/arm.c (arm_issue_rate): Add marvell_pj4.
>> ? ? ? ?* config/arm/arm-cores.def: Add core marvell-pj4.
>> ? ? ? ?* config/arm/arm-tune.md: Regenerated.
>> ? ? ? ?* config/arm/arm-tables.opt: Regenerated.
>> ? ? ? ?* doc/invoke.texi: Added entry for marvell-pj4.
>
> This command line option should also be added to BE8_LINK_SPEC similar
> to what's done for the other v7-a cores.
>
> Ok with that change.
>
> regards,
> Ramana
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> P.S. I create the patch from revision 187308, but this revision is unable to build successfully, then I apply this patch to revision 187623 and successfully build and pass the testsuite.
>>