This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch ARM/ configury] Add fall-back check for gnu_unique_object
- From: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana dot radhakrishnan at linaro dot org>
- To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
- Cc: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:49:18 +0100
- Subject: Re: [Patch ARM/ configury] Add fall-back check for gnu_unique_object
- References: <CACUk7=V3FsDwOyqNCc2AJ78iVLh7M=G_+bVVz+DYOTTAyZB9Pw@mail.gmail.com> <CACUk7=XYM0AkEKyWWq0hB3Y2zGbPQY9YJXtooN+etWB+uOKtQQ@mail.gmail.com> <201203100039.q2A0dRt3030036@greed.delorie.com> <CACUk7=Wz2WytV+fBHiO+WJga9OiYNnq5fnxT9Rgg3JWbSyGHgg@mail.gmail.com> <201203121810.q2CIA7QG012460@greed.delorie.com> <CACUk7=Ww7PPuoFFY8H3P8m+e5Jznu10OF9H0KWfVY3x9vCAR8A@mail.gmail.com> <4F60BEA3.50001@gnu.org> <CACUk7=UNFFC1kBVJy0=MTosTDrtvPT+Gx=8MV-nPqw7p4TdVnA@mail.gmail.com> <CACUk7=X5hc0Xek0z_2OD+4oVxngr5cz5UWmjeQR-vERyEgnRtA@mail.gmail.com>
On 10 April 2012 10:11, Ramana Radhakrishnan
<ramana.radhakrishnan@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> The patch with correct configure output is ok.
>>
>> Thanks - this is what I committed.
>
> Is this something that can be considered for backporting to release
> branches?? This patch technically doesn't fix a regression but brings
> in line behaviour of the normal bootstrap for %gnu_unique_object ?
Ping - Is this ok to backport to the 4.7 and 4.6 branches ?
Ramana