This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 53567

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at gmail dot com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 18:38:39 +0200
Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] PR 53567
References: <4FCCC301.7040505@oracle.com> <4FCCFA7A.8040508@redhat.com> <4FCD3CE8.2040307@oracle.com> <4FCD4364.7060103@redhat.com> <4FCD488D.5000703@oracle.com> <4FCD5148.8040309@oracle.com> <4FCD6AAB.10609@redhat.com> <4FCDE6C4.7030705@oracle.com> <4FCE14DA.2070304@redhat.com> <15DBACDF-47D4-4362-BEEE-2722BB4451E9@oracle.com> <4FCE34F4.1040601@redhat.com>

Hi,

> We could, but I think it's fine to have it as an alias for LOOKUP_PROTECT; the LOOKUP_NORMAL name implies that we're doing a normal name lookup, whereas LOOKUP_PROTECT is what that implies.

Believe it or not, yesterday for a few minutes I had it exactly as an alias. Ok, I'll do that.

Paolo

References:
- [C++ Patch] PR 53567
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 53567
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 53567
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 53567
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 53567
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 53567
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 53567
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 53567
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 53567
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 53567
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 53567
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]