This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [cxx-conversion] New Hash Table (issue6244048)

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Lawrence Crowl <crowl at google dot com>, dnovillo at google dot com
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:56:29 +0200
Subject: Re: [cxx-conversion] New Hash Table (issue6244048)
References: <20120524164342.DDF542225E1@jade.mtv.corp.google.com> <20120525062524.GT16117@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1205251409060.25409@wotan.suse.de> <CAAiZkiC0ADQCSDddPTXT0rTiTC+ETD=13cE8nsYX4JA=+KCUQA@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1205251547210.25409@wotan.suse.de>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 03:51:25PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> That's one of my fears, namely that those used to the libstdc++ style 
> impose that on the compiler source base.  Because IMHO the libstdc++ style 
> isn't very appealing.

Seconded.

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cxx-conversion] New Hash Table (issue6244048)
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- [cxx-conversion] New Hash Table (issue6244048)
  - From: Lawrence Crowl
- Re: [cxx-conversion] New Hash Table (issue6244048)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [cxx-conversion] New Hash Table (issue6244048)
  - From: Michael Matz
- Re: [cxx-conversion] New Hash Table (issue6244048)
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [cxx-conversion] New Hash Table (issue6244048)
  - From: Michael Matz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]