This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 05/22/2012 08:22 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:Maybe... I don't know really, what happens with that location. Alternately, I bootstrapped and I'm finishing testing the below. Let me know, I don't have a strong opinion at the moment: if we can consistently use inform for all those general messages provided by objc, I think it would be good, I don't know how "bad" is adding warn_all.Ok, thanks. Today I wanted to concretely test and post a patch but I noticed this other objc bit in objc-next-runtime-abi-01.c which I don't know how to handle due to the OPT_Wall gate:
warning_at (UNKNOWN_LOCATION, OPT_Wall, "%<-fobjc-sjlj-exceptions%> is the only supported exceptions " "system for %<-fnext-runtime%> with %<-fobjc-abi-version%> < 2");
If the objc maintainers could help with those uses of warning_at (0 in the objc tree, I have a patch ready for the asserts proper.
What if we just changed UNKNOWN_LOCATION to BUILTINS_LOCATION for these diagnostics?
Thanks, Paolo.
Attachment:
CL_diagnostic
Description: Text document
Attachment:
patch_diagnostic
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |