This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [h8300] increase dwarf address size

From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 21:35:01 -0600
Subject: Re: [h8300] increase dwarf address size
References: <201205100027.q4A0RELM022946@greed.delorie.com> <4FABDA8E.9070904@redhat.com> <201205101721.q4AHLgJt014589@greed.delorie.com>

On 05/10/2012 11:21 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:

Regardless, shouldn't DWARF2_ADDR_SIZE be POINTER_SIZE / BITS_PER_UNIT?
That's the default. It doesn't work because pointers are still 16 bits.

Something's still not right then. The H8/300 has 16 bit pointers and a 64k address space and all the processors in the family still support that mode.

Jeff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [h8300] increase dwarf address size
  - From: DJ Delorie

References:
- [h8300] increase dwarf address size
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [h8300] increase dwarf address size
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: [h8300] increase dwarf address size
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]