This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] Improve andq $0xffffffff, %reg handling (PR target/53110)


Hi!

We have a splitter for reg1 = reg2 & 0xffffffff, but only if regnums
are different.  But movl %edi, %edi is a cheaper variant of
andq $0xffffffff, %rdi even with the same register and doesn't clobber
flags, so this patch attempts to expand it as a zero extension early.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2012-04-25  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR target/53110
	* config/i386/i386.md (and<mode>3): For andq $0xffffffff, reg
	instead expand it as zero extension.

--- gcc/config/i386/i386.md.jj	2012-04-25 12:14:54.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/config/i386/i386.md	2012-04-25 14:50:48.708925963 +0200
@@ -7694,7 +7694,17 @@ (define_expand "and<mode>3"
 	(and:SWIM (match_operand:SWIM 1 "nonimmediate_operand")
 		  (match_operand:SWIM 2 "<general_szext_operand>")))]
   ""
-  "ix86_expand_binary_operator (AND, <MODE>mode, operands); DONE;")
+{
+  if (<MODE>mode == DImode
+      && GET_CODE (operands[2]) == CONST_INT
+      && INTVAL (operands[2]) == (HOST_WIDE_INT) 0xffffffff
+      && REG_P (operands[1]))
+    emit_insn (gen_zero_extendsidi2 (operands[0],
+				     gen_lowpart (SImode, operands[1])));
+  else
+    ix86_expand_binary_operator (AND, <MODE>mode, operands);
+  DONE;
+})
 
 (define_insn "*anddi_1"
   [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=r,rm,r,r")

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]