This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52599

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:50:16 +0200
Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52599
References: <4F8D51E4.5040509@oracle.com> <4F8D6D3E.2090902@redhat.com> <4F8D8DC5.9060703@oracle.com>

On 04/17/2012 05:35 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

Hi,
I think build_constexpr_constructor_member_initializers is a better place for that check, since it's already looking at the tree structure.
Indeed. I'm finishing testing the below. Ok if it passes?

... uhm, actually like this seems more correct to me, I'm testing this variant instead. Sorry.

Paolo.

///////////////////

Attachment: patch_52599_2b
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52599
  - From: Jason Merrill

References:
- [C++ Patch] PR 52599
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52599
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52599
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]