This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [4.5/Ada] Fix build with 4.6 compiler

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:08:50 +0200
Subject: Re: [4.5/Ada] Fix build with 4.6 compiler
References: <201204040936.52315.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <20120404074553.GK16117@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>

> Shouldn't this be * 100 and > 405 ?  I mean, we already had GCC
> 2.95, 2.96, 2.97 and 20 + 95 is > 45...

This idiom is the one already used in tracebak.c for example.  Would that 
really matter in practice?

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [4.5/Ada] Fix build with 4.6 compiler
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- [4.5/Ada] Fix build with 4.6 compiler
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [4.5/Ada] Fix build with 4.6 compiler
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]