This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [ping 6] [patch] attribute to reverse bitfield allocations (is anyone even reading these?)
- From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- To: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 15:57:04 -0400
- Subject: Re: [ping 6] [patch] attribute to reverse bitfield allocations (is anyone even reading these?)
- References: <201103092245.p29MjZQ5018956@greed.delorie.com> <201107112052.p6BKqICk017576@greed.delorie.com> <201107212223.p6LMNE07001515@greed.delorie.com> <201108221736.p7MHaeqN025057@greed.delorie.com> <201201110556.q0B5uBV9028046@greed.delorie.com> <201201241939.q0OJdvHw005708@greed.delorie.com> <201202131943.q1DJh6ZK011131@greed.delorie.com> <201204021941.q32Jfwsq015053@greed.delorie.com> <DAA3A44A-3D9A-405F-B274-0C9329EC8E91@comcast.net>
> Did you ever dig up the Apple test cases from the APPLE LOCAL work I
> pointed you at earlier?
Sorry, I read that as "the internal tree at Apple" not "the apple
branch at fsf". I'll look at it, thanks!
> They will be more comprehensive that any testing you've done, and,
> if you get them to all pass, the work should be closer to being
> complete. The feature needed a ton of testcases, a few didn't cut
> it.
Worse, the test cases need to be target-endian-specific, and
sizeof(int) agnostic.