This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 14 March 2012 15:52, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org> wrote: > Il 14/03/2012 16:37, Ramana Radhakrishnan ha scritto: >> Empirically I spotted this odd behaviour ?with >> gcc_GAS_CHECK_FEATURE and comments - Attached are the 2 alternate >> patches that I tried and the difference in the configure scripts >> themselves . I am no m4 expert but it does look like the m4_substr in >> gcc_GAS_CHECK_FEATURE doesn't really like that comment there. >> >> Any ideas anyone ? I must decline any knowledge of m4 at this point >> and I don't want to commit this until I understand what's going on >> here. > > Yes, the # comment is actually part of the macro argument. ?If you want > to write a "real" comment (i.e. at the m4 rather than shell level) use > "dnl" instead of "#". > > The patch with correct configure output is ok. Thanks - this is what I committed. Ramana 2012-03-15 Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan@linaro.org> * config.gcc (target_type_format_char): New. Document it. Set it for arm*-*-* . * configure.ac (gnu_unique_option): Use target_type_format_char in test. Comment rationale. * configure: Regenerate . Ramana > > Paolo
Attachment:
committed.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |