This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Fix PR target/51921
- From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:09:07 +0100
- Subject: Fix PR target/51921
This fixes the regression in the frame unwinding support on SPARC/Solaris 11
present on the mainline and 4.6 branch. Tested (by me) on 6 differents OS
versions of Solaris 8, 9 and 10 and on Solaris 11 by Ian and Rainer.
Applied on the mainline and 4.6 branch.
2012-02-15 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
PR target/51921
PR target/52205
* config/sparc/sol2-unwind.h (sparc64_is_sighandler): Add support for
Solaris 11 and slightly reformat.
(sparc_is_sighandler): Likewise.
--
Eric Botcazou
Index: config/sparc/sol2-unwind.h
===================================================================
--- config/sparc/sol2-unwind.h (revision 183864)
+++ config/sparc/sol2-unwind.h (working copy)
@@ -119,7 +119,12 @@ sparc64_is_sighandler (unsigned int *pc,
unsigned int cuh_pattern
= *(unsigned int *)(*(unsigned long *)(cfa + 15*8) - 4);
- if (cuh_pattern == 0xd25fa7ef)
+ if (cuh_pattern == 0x92100019)
+ /* This matches the call_user_handler pattern for Solaris 11.
+ This is the same setup as for Solaris 9, see below. */
+ *nframes = 3;
+
+ else if (cuh_pattern == 0xd25fa7ef)
{
/* This matches the call_user_handler pattern for Solaris 10.
There are 2 cases so we look for the return address of the
@@ -140,6 +145,7 @@ sparc64_is_sighandler (unsigned int *pc,
*/
*nframes = 2;
}
+
else if (cuh_pattern == 0x9410001a || cuh_pattern == 0x94100013)
/* This matches the call_user_handler pattern for Solaris 9 and
for Solaris 8 running inside Solaris Containers respectively
@@ -152,7 +158,8 @@ sparc64_is_sighandler (unsigned int *pc,
<kernel>
*/
*nframes = 3;
- else
+
+ else /* cuh_pattern == 0xe0272010 */
/* This is the default Solaris 8 case.
We need to move up two frames:
@@ -162,6 +169,7 @@ sparc64_is_sighandler (unsigned int *pc,
<kernel>
*/
*nframes = 2;
+
return 1;
}
@@ -296,7 +304,12 @@ sparc_is_sighandler (unsigned int *pc, v
unsigned int cuh_pattern
= *(unsigned int *)(*(unsigned int *)(cfa + 15*4) - 4);
- if (cuh_pattern == 0xd407a04c)
+ if (cuh_pattern == 0x92100019)
+ /* This matches the call_user_handler pattern for Solaris 11.
+ This is the same setup as for Solaris 9, see below. */
+ *nframes = 3;
+
+ else if (cuh_pattern == 0xd407a04c)
{
/* This matches the call_user_handler pattern for Solaris 10.
There are 2 cases so we look for the return address of the
@@ -317,6 +330,7 @@ sparc_is_sighandler (unsigned int *pc, v
*/
*nframes = 2;
}
+
else if (cuh_pattern == 0x9410001a || cuh_pattern == 0x9410001b)
/* This matches the call_user_handler pattern for Solaris 9 and
for Solaris 8 running inside Solaris Containers respectively.
@@ -329,7 +343,8 @@ sparc_is_sighandler (unsigned int *pc, v
<kernel>
*/
*nframes = 3;
- else
+
+ else /* cuh_pattern == 0x90100018 */
/* This is the default Solaris 8 case.
We need to move up two frames:
@@ -339,6 +354,7 @@ sparc_is_sighandler (unsigned int *pc, v
<kernel>
*/
*nframes = 2;
+
return 1;
}