Re: [C++ Patch] PR 51327

[Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>]

Hi again,

and sorry about the delay.
> On 11/30/2011 06:41 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> > Ok. The point is, locate_ctor turns an error_mark_node returned by
> > locate_fn_flags - meaning indeed not callable - into NULL_TREE. In fact,
> > uses elsewhere of locate_ctor / get_default_ctor always check for it.
> Ah, I see.  I guess what we want here is the GCC 4.5 version of 
> locate_ctor instead of the new one; once we've checked that we have a 
> default ctor and no user-provided default ctor, there must be a unique 
> defaulted ctor so just walking CLASSTYPE_CONSTRUCTORS is correct.  And 
> then we can call maybe_explain_implicit_delete if it's deleted.
So, is the below a good implementation? Tested x86_64-linux.

Thanks,
Paolo.

////////////////////

Attachment: CL_51327_2
Description: Text document

Attachment: patch_51327_2
Description: Text document