This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, trans-mem]: Fix PR51830, FAIL: libitm.c/mem(cpy|set)-1.c execution test on x86_32
On 01/20/2012 12:51 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> OTOH, in GTM_beginTransaction we can
> still access other variable arguments through the pointer to CFA.
Well, no, not really.
If we really want GTM_beginTransaction to have access to the
variadic portions, we'll need to have the sjlj stub pass in
a va_list.
Thankfully we can generally ignore this until we actually need
those extra bits. Which is not in the near-term cards.
r~
- References:
- [PATCH, trans-mem]: Fix PR51830, FAIL: libitm.c/mem(cpy|set)-1.c execution test on x86_32
- Re: [PATCH, trans-mem]: Fix PR51830, FAIL: libitm.c/mem(cpy|set)-1.c execution test on x86_32
- Re: [PATCH, trans-mem]: Fix PR51830, FAIL: libitm.c/mem(cpy|set)-1.c execution test on x86_32
- Re: [PATCH, trans-mem]: Fix PR51830, FAIL: libitm.c/mem(cpy|set)-1.c execution test on x86_32
- Re: [PATCH, trans-mem]: Fix PR51830, FAIL: libitm.c/mem(cpy|set)-1.c execution test on x86_32
- Re: [PATCH, trans-mem]: Fix PR51830, FAIL: libitm.c/mem(cpy|set)-1.c execution test on x86_32
- Re: [PATCH, trans-mem]: Fix PR51830, FAIL: libitm.c/mem(cpy|set)-1.c execution test on x86_32