This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [libitm] Skip static_ctor.C test (PR libitm/51173)
- From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- To: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:29:31 -0800
- Subject: Re: [libitm] Skip static_ctor.C test (PR libitm/51173)
- References: <yddr4yz603j.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
On Jan 16, 2012, at 9:14 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> As suggested in the PR, it would be better to just skip the test to
> avoid noise in mail-report.log:
Usually we avoid noise in the testing log files by making testcases pass? I know, this one is kinda inelegant, but I'd just leave it as is. If it doesn't pass on any useful target, I suppose skipping or just removing the testcase would be fine, with the idea that the testcases is added back or reenabled when the PR is fixed. Let's give the TM people a chance to weigh in, if they'd like, but, if they don't, I'll Ok it if you prefer to disable or remove it.