This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch,testuite]: Fix bad testcase assuming int = int32_t


On Jan 12, 2012, at 8:44 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Again: A test case that fails because it incorrectly assumes int is 32 bits wide.
> 
> Ok to apply?

I'd think the testcase is more naturally:

> return ~((uint32_t) (arg > -3));

Does that work for you?  Anyone want to weigh in on which version is better (if the second version works)?  I think I have a preference for the form above.

> -  return ~(arg > -3);
> +  return ~((unsigned) (arg > -3));



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]