This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Minor contrib.texi update

From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:09:15 -0700
Subject: Re: Minor contrib.texi update
References: <4EC20291.8090702@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1111151718580.7813@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <4EC29F8C.2000608@redhat.com> <alpine.LFD.2.02.1111190345590.2265@gerinyyl> <4ECA8040.1080905@redhat.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1111231213110.4376@gerinyyl.fvgr>

On 11/23/11 04:16, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Jeff Law wrote:

Just mind the long line

Do we wrap earlier in the texi file (first line is 79chars I think)?
Or are you referring to an output file?


I fail to find the reference now, but usually try to wrap things
such that a patch (which adds "+ " or "- ") still fits with wrapping,
or ideally a quoted patch (so ">  + " or ">  - "), so around 76.

Not a big deal, though.

I wrapped it before the checkin. Good point about how it appears in a patch -- I've wrapped for that reason in the past as well.

jeff

References:
- Minor contrib.texi update
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: Minor contrib.texi update
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Minor contrib.texi update
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: Minor contrib.texi update
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: Minor contrib.texi update
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: Minor contrib.texi update
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]