This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PING 1 [Patch Ada RFA] make sure that multilibs are built with correct s-oscons.ads

From: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>
To: Iain Sandoe <developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk>
Cc: Thomas Quinot <quinot at adacore dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 17:01:27 +0100
Subject: Re: PING 1 [Patch Ada RFA] make sure that multilibs are built with correct s-oscons.ads
References: <87B813F3-5B28-4F36-A2BD-C0F919D5BE89@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> <4A925FE3-CA50-44BD-9600-6F460BA401CA@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> <20111109094949.GA53184@melamine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <20111109095442.GA79314@adacore.com> <D360AC8D-C603-422C-B3BF-5288D144A7DC@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk>

> May I repeat my question re. 4.6?
> Since this is a wrong-code situation, I would have thought it eligible for
> a back-port?

Well, it's not a wrong-code as in "wrong code generated by the back-end",
and it's not a regression.

In any case, backporting to 4.6 is fine with me.

Arno

References:
- PING 1 [Patch Ada RFA] make sure that multilibs are built with correct s-oscons.ads
  - From: Iain Sandoe
- Re: PING 1 [Patch Ada RFA] make sure that multilibs are built with correct s-oscons.ads
  - From: Thomas Quinot
- Re: PING 1 [Patch Ada RFA] make sure that multilibs are built with correct s-oscons.ads
  - From: Arnaud Charlet
- Re: PING 1 [Patch Ada RFA] make sure that multilibs are built with correct s-oscons.ads
  - From: Iain Sandoe

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]