This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] 19/n: trans-mem: compiler tree/gimple stuff


On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Well - we usually don't grab bits off the tree nodes lightly. ?Especially
>> if
>> the cgraph seems to be more fit.
>>
>>> If this is a suggestion, I can put it on my laundry list of future things
>>> todo (after merge, 4.8?, etc).
>>
>> There are not many consumers of the flag, so fixing it shouldn't be hard.
>> For 4.7 definitely.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> The following patch puts the bit in the cgraph structure.
>
> There was a comment originally that we may be able to calculate this bit
> from the CFG, but I'm not sure whether this applies any more, or how much
> work it would be. ?I left the comment in.
>
> Tested on x86-64 Linux.
>
> OK for branch?

Ok.

Thanks,
Richard.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]