This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, SMS] Fix marking of SMSed loops as BB_DISABLE_SCHEDULE

From: Revital Eres <revital dot eres at linaro dot org>
To: Ayal Zaks <ayal dot zaks at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Patch Tracking <patches at linaro dot org>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:50:54 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH, SMS] Fix marking of SMSed loops as BB_DISABLE_SCHEDULE
References: <CAHz1=dVpFJP3m8MyTf5MG=giGKhn7=6mnFMW78OTRFuGP3RsHQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHTt4KuB=sgpgb6hJr9Bpzt47XHrhet8PT-bpBdBtJu1sH0CnQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

>> Tested and bootstrap on all languages except java (PR50879) on
>> ppc64-redhat-linux, enabling SMS on loops with SC 1.
>>
>> OK for mainline?
>>
>
> OK, seems reasonable.
>
> Please fix typo (in original comment):
> - ? ? ? ? ? ?scheduling passes doesn't touch it. ?*/
> + ? ? ? ? ? ?scheduling passes don't touch it. ?*/

I realize that I forgot to guard the marking in the epilogue and
prologue with -fresched-modulo-sched, sorry about that. I am testing
the attached patch and will commit it after testing completes if there
are no further comments.

Thanks,
Revital

Attachment: patch_mark_fix.txt
Description: Text document

References:
- [PATCH, SMS] Fix marking of SMSed loops as BB_DISABLE_SCHEDULE
  - From: Revital Eres
- Re: [PATCH, SMS] Fix marking of SMSed loops as BB_DISABLE_SCHEDULE
  - From: Ayal Zaks

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]