This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: PR rtl-optimization/50696: [x32] Unnecessary lea

From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
To: bonzini at gnu dot org
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:14:55 EDT
Subject: Re: PATCH: PR rtl-optimization/50696: [x32] Unnecessary lea
References: <20111012223450.GA11516@intel.com> <11110122240.AA07538@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <CAMe9rOrfH_SMrzhMZWX9BDTnvgVO-zhHLrwGiX-xXmkPJsV-yg@mail.gmail.com> <11110122304.AA07835@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <4E96BAA6.9000809@gnu.org> <11110131251.AA14799@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <4E96E571.3060006@gnu.org>

> Or being fooled by the 0xfffffffc masking, perhaps.

No, I'm pretty sure that's NOT the case.  The *whole point* of the
routine is to deal with that masking.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: PR rtl-optimization/50696: [x32] Unnecessary lea
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- PATCH: PR rtl-optimization/50696: [x32] Unnecessary lea
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: PR rtl-optimization/50696: [x32] Unnecessary lea
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: PATCH: PR rtl-optimization/50696: [x32] Unnecessary lea
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: PR rtl-optimization/50696: [x32] Unnecessary lea
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: PATCH: PR rtl-optimization/50696: [x32] Unnecessary lea
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: PATCH: PR rtl-optimization/50696: [x32] Unnecessary lea
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: PATCH: PR rtl-optimization/50696: [x32] Unnecessary lea
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]