This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

[C++ Patch] PR 50454

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:09:21 +0200
Subject: [C++ Patch] PR 50454

Hi,

as I tried to analyze/explain in the audit trail, apparently we are doing something bogus in grokdeclarator wrt unsigned __int128, which leads to the latter being wrongly rejected with -pedantic-errors, at variance with plain __int128 or __int128_t / __uint128_t for that matter. Thus I prepared the below. Tested x86_64-linux.

Ok for mainline?

Thanks,
Paolo.

/////////////////////

Attachment: CL_50454
Description: Text document

Attachment: patch_50454
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 50454
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]