This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Cleanup DW_CFA_GNU_args_size handling

From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, bernds at codesourcery dot com, avr at gjlay dot de, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 02:45:12 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [RFC] Cleanup DW_CFA_GNU_args_size handling
References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1108201241370.2761@gerinyyl.fvgr> <201109092015.04654.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <CAMe9rOrB+LoNbu9UCL2RaFS1FyqhfJPrQFP8kQ0z5NsW=CcRTQ@mail.gmail.com> <201109101301.53602.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <CAMe9rOoKDM+cOUEMsWi0p6CJDWDekOXMBoKOUHMp8iWomV6wfw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 10 Sep 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Our assembler supports CFI, but objdump may be too old to dump 
> DW_CFA_advance_loc and this feature is mis-detected.

Should this be autoconf-ed, then?  As a test for objdump?

(FWIW my bootstrap comparison failure, cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/PR50010 ,
also seems to occur when I configure with --disable-initfini-array.)

Gerald

References:
- Re: [RFC] Cleanup DW_CFA_GNU_args_size handling
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [RFC] Cleanup DW_CFA_GNU_args_size handling
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [RFC] Cleanup DW_CFA_GNU_args_size handling
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [RFC] Cleanup DW_CFA_GNU_args_size handling
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]