This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GIMPLE and intent of variables

From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: Mateusz Grabowski <grabekm90 at wp dot pl>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:12:35 +0200
Subject: Re: GIMPLE and intent of variables
References: <32275433.post@talk.nabble.com> <32310211.post@talk.nabble.com> <CAFiYyc1LBsk-j8iEuk8BT2aB-HBHbO__9+eYhqErSRoG3uzmyw@mail.gmail.com> <32310942.post@talk.nabble.com>

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Mateusz Grabowski <grabekm90@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>
> Richard Guenther-2 wrote:
>>
>>
>> The latter.
>>
>>
>
> But how to do it? I want to have all functions after SSA pass, but before
> any optimizations. Maybe you could tell me how to enforce it (or even better
> - a small example)?
> Thanks in advance.

There is no such place at the moment.

> --
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/GIMPLE-and-intent-of-variables-tp32275433p32310942.html
> Sent from the gcc - patches mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

References:
- GIMPLE and intent of variables
  - From: grabekm90
- Re: GIMPLE and intent of variables
  - From: Mateusz Grabowski
- Re: GIMPLE and intent of variables
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: GIMPLE and intent of variables
  - From: Mateusz Grabowski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]