This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] Fix tree-optimization/49963

From: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Sebastian Pop <sebpop at gmail dot com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:04:49 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [Patch] Fix tree-optimization/49963
References: <4E4C019D.1040201@oracle.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1108181029530.2130@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <4E4CE8D1.4090907@oracle.com>

On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, Paolo Carlini wrote:

> On 08/18/2011 10:30 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > Ok.
> Great. Thus I'm going ahead and committing the patch to fix the regression.
> > It looks like we might want to elimiate abs_hwi alltogether in favor of
> > absu_hwi? 
> Indeed, you are totally right. But I'd rather work on that as a followup patch
> (maybe with Sebastian' help?) because it doesn't seem completely trivial: I'm
> mostly worried by the existing uses of abs_hwi *inside* hwint.c itself not but
> those two remaining instances outside of it (which would be possible to
> replace immediately).

Sure as a followup.

Richard.

References:
- [Patch] Fix tree-optimization/49963
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] Fix tree-optimization/49963
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [Patch] Fix tree-optimization/49963
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]