This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] Cleanup DW_CFA_GNU_args_size handling
- From: Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich dot Weigand at de dot ibm dot com>
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Cc: avr at gjlay dot de, bernds at codesourcery dot com, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, iant at google dot com
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 18:00:52 +0100
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Cleanup DW_CFA_GNU_args_size handling
- References: <201108031407.p73E7Erc008790@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <4E39660E.2020305@redhat.com>
Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote on 08/03/2011 04:15:26 PM:
> On 08/03/2011 07:07 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > Was this assert intended to impose requirements on target's
> > restore_stack_block implemtations? What exactly are those
> > supposed to be?
>
> The assert was not intended to impose requirements, but to figure
> out if I needed to do anything special here.
>
> Binutils has no simulator for spu. Can you file a bug with a
> specific test case and CC me?
Certainly, this is now PR 49968. You should be able to reproduce
the ICE with a spu-elf cross-cc1 without anything else. If you'd
like me to test anything on spu natively, just let me know ...
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com