This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC PATCH] Add alloc_size attribute to the default operator new and operator new[]

From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 15:55:39 +0200
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Add alloc_size attribute to the default operator new and operator new[]
References: <20110803123117.GG2687@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <CAFiYyc30+J2gKk3BBUikJ375XOtHGpN07cKQZEsEFBT_bkBjfg@mail.gmail.com> <4E3947CC.5060305@gnu.org>

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org> wrote:
> On 08/03/2011 02:46 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> If that's reasonable then adding the malloc attribute should be, too.
>
> Making aliasing stricter for -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 sounds wrong though.

The patch unconditionally adds malloc_size.

Richard.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Add alloc_size attribute to the default operator new and operator new[]
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- [RFC PATCH] Add alloc_size attribute to the default operator new and operator new[]
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Add alloc_size attribute to the default operator new and operator new[]
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Add alloc_size attribute to the default operator new and operator new[]
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]