This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch tree-optimization]: [1 of 3]: Boolify compares & more


On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch - first of series - adds to fold and some helper routines support
> for one-bit precision bitwise folding and detection.
> This patch is necessary for - next patch of series - boolification of
> comparisons.
>
> Bootstrapped and regression tested for all standard-languages (plus
> Ada and Obj-C++) on host x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
>
> Ok for apply?

Factoring out fold_truth_andor to a function should be done separately.
A patch that does just that is pre-approved.

Otherwise the patch globs too many changes and lacks reasoning.
Why do we want to handle all this in fold when the boolification
happens only after gimplification?

Thanks,
Richard.

> Regards,
> Kai
>
> ChangeLog
>
> 2011-07-07 ?Kai Tietz ?<ktietz@redhat.com>
>
> ? ? ? ?* fold-const.c (fold_truth_not_expr): Handle
> ? ? ? ?one bit precision bitwise operations.
> ? ? ? ?(fold_range_test): Likewise.
> ? ? ? ?(fold_truthop): Likewise.
> ? ? ? ?(fold_binary_loc): Likewise.
> ? ? ? ?(fold_truth_andor): Function replaces truth_andor
> ? ? ? ?label.
> ? ? ? ?(fold_ternary_loc): Use truth_value_type_p instead
> ? ? ? ?of truth_value_p.
> ? ? ? ?* gimple.c (canonicalize_cond_expr_cond): Likewise.
> ? ? ? ?* gimplify.c (gimple_boolify): Likewise.
> ? ? ? ?* tree-ssa-structalias.c (find_func_aliases): Likewise.
> ? ? ? ?* tree-ssa-forwprop.c (truth_valued_ssa_name): Likewise.
> ? ? ? ?* tree.h (truth_value_type_p): New function.
> ? ? ? ?(truth_value_p): Implemented as macro via truth_value_type_p.
>
>
> Index: gcc-head/gcc/fold-const.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc-head.orig/gcc/fold-const.c
> +++ gcc-head/gcc/fold-const.c
> @@ -3074,20 +3074,35 @@ fold_truth_not_expr (location_t loc, tre
> ? ? case INTEGER_CST:
> ? ? ? return constant_boolean_node (integer_zerop (arg), type);
>
> + ? ?case BIT_AND_EXPR:
> + ? ? ?if (integer_onep (TREE_OPERAND (arg, 1)))
> + ? ? ? return build2_loc (loc, EQ_EXPR, type, arg, build_int_cst (type, 0));
> + ? ? ?if (TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0))) != 1)
> + ? ? ? ?return NULL_TREE;
> + ? ? ?/* fall through */
> ? ? case TRUTH_AND_EXPR:
> ? ? ? loc1 = expr_location_or (TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0), loc);
> ? ? ? loc2 = expr_location_or (TREE_OPERAND (arg, 1), loc);
> - ? ? ?return build2_loc (loc, TRUTH_OR_EXPR, type,
> + ? ? ?return build2_loc (loc, (code == BIT_AND_EXPR ? BIT_IOR_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? : TRUTH_OR_EXPR), type,
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? invert_truthvalue_loc (loc1, TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0)),
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? invert_truthvalue_loc (loc2, TREE_OPERAND (arg, 1)));
>
> + ? ?case BIT_IOR_EXPR:
> + ? ? ?if (TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0))) != 1)
> + ? ? ? ?return NULL_TREE;
> + ? ? ?/* fall through. ?*/
> ? ? case TRUTH_OR_EXPR:
> ? ? ? loc1 = expr_location_or (TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0), loc);
> ? ? ? loc2 = expr_location_or (TREE_OPERAND (arg, 1), loc);
> - ? ? ?return build2_loc (loc, TRUTH_AND_EXPR, type,
> + ? ? ?return build2_loc (loc, (code == BIT_IOR_EXPR ? BIT_AND_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? : TRUTH_AND_EXPR), type,
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? invert_truthvalue_loc (loc1, TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0)),
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? invert_truthvalue_loc (loc2, TREE_OPERAND (arg, 1)));
> -
> + ? ?case BIT_XOR_EXPR:
> + ? ? ?if (TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0))) != 1)
> + ? ? ? ?return NULL_TREE;
> + ? ? ?/* fall through. ?*/
> ? ? case TRUTH_XOR_EXPR:
> ? ? ? /* Here we can invert either operand. ?We invert the first operand
> ? ? ? ? unless the second operand is a TRUTH_NOT_EXPR in which case our
> @@ -3095,10 +3110,14 @@ fold_truth_not_expr (location_t loc, tre
> ? ? ? ? negation of the second operand. ?*/
>
> ? ? ? if (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (arg, 1)) == TRUTH_NOT_EXPR)
> - ? ? ? return build2_loc (loc, TRUTH_XOR_EXPR, type, TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0),
> + ? ? ? return build2_loc (loc, code, type, TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0),
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?TREE_OPERAND (TREE_OPERAND (arg, 1), 0));
> + ? ? ?else if (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (arg, 1)) == BIT_NOT_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ?&& TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (arg, 1))) == 1)
> + ? ? ? return build2_loc (loc, code, type, TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0),
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? TREE_OPERAND (TREE_OPERAND (arg, 1), 0));
> ? ? ? else
> - ? ? ? return build2_loc (loc, TRUTH_XOR_EXPR, type,
> + ? ? ? return build2_loc (loc, code, type,
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? invert_truthvalue_loc (loc, TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0)),
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? TREE_OPERAND (arg, 1));
>
> @@ -3116,6 +3135,11 @@ fold_truth_not_expr (location_t loc, tre
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? invert_truthvalue_loc (loc1, TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0)),
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? invert_truthvalue_loc (loc2, TREE_OPERAND (arg, 1)));
>
> +
> + ? ?case BIT_NOT_EXPR:
> + ? ? ?if (TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0))) != 1)
> + ? ? ? ?return NULL_TREE;
> + ? ? ?/* fall through */
> ? ? case TRUTH_NOT_EXPR:
> ? ? ? return TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0);
>
> @@ -3158,11 +3182,6 @@ fold_truth_not_expr (location_t loc, tre
> ? ? ? return build1_loc (loc, TREE_CODE (arg), type,
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? invert_truthvalue_loc (loc1, TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0)));
>
> - ? ?case BIT_AND_EXPR:
> - ? ? ?if (!integer_onep (TREE_OPERAND (arg, 1)))
> - ? ? ? return NULL_TREE;
> - ? ? ?return build2_loc (loc, EQ_EXPR, type, arg, build_int_cst (type, 0));
> -
> ? ? case SAVE_EXPR:
> ? ? ? return build1_loc (loc, TRUTH_NOT_EXPR, type, arg);
>
> @@ -4800,7 +4819,7 @@ fold_range_test (location_t loc, enum tr
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? tree op0, tree op1)
> ?{
> ? int or_op = (code == TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|| code == TRUTH_OR_EXPR);
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|| code == TRUTH_OR_EXPR || code == BIT_IOR_EXPR);
> ? int in0_p, in1_p, in_p;
> ? tree low0, low1, low, high0, high1, high;
> ? bool strict_overflow_p = false;
> @@ -5099,8 +5118,9 @@ fold_truthop (location_t loc, enum tree_
> ? ? ? ?}
> ? ? }
>
> - ?code = ((code == TRUTH_AND_EXPR || code == TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR)
> - ? ? ? ? ? TRUTH_AND_EXPR : TRUTH_OR_EXPR);
> + ?if (code != BIT_AND_EXPR && code != BIT_IOR_EXPR)
> + ? ?code = ((code == TRUTH_AND_EXPR || code == TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR)
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? TRUTH_AND_EXPR : TRUTH_OR_EXPR);
>
> ? /* If the RHS can be evaluated unconditionally and its operands are
> ? ? ?simple, it wins to evaluate the RHS unconditionally on machines
> @@ -5115,7 +5135,7 @@ fold_truthop (location_t loc, enum tree_
> ? ? ? && simple_operand_p (rr_arg))
> ? ? {
> ? ? ? /* Convert (a != 0) || (b != 0) into (a | b) != 0. ?*/
> - ? ? ?if (code == TRUTH_OR_EXPR
> + ? ? ?if ((code == TRUTH_OR_EXPR || code == BIT_IOR_EXPR)
> ? ? ? ? ?&& lcode == NE_EXPR && integer_zerop (lr_arg)
> ? ? ? ? ?&& rcode == NE_EXPR && integer_zerop (rr_arg)
> ? ? ? ? ?&& TREE_TYPE (ll_arg) == TREE_TYPE (rl_arg)
> @@ -5126,7 +5146,7 @@ fold_truthop (location_t loc, enum tree_
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (ll_arg), 0));
>
> ? ? ? /* Convert (a == 0) && (b == 0) into (a | b) == 0. ?*/
> - ? ? ?if (code == TRUTH_AND_EXPR
> + ? ? ?if ((code == TRUTH_AND_EXPR || code == BIT_AND_EXPR)
> ? ? ? ? ?&& lcode == EQ_EXPR && integer_zerop (lr_arg)
> ? ? ? ? ?&& rcode == EQ_EXPR && integer_zerop (rr_arg)
> ? ? ? ? ?&& TREE_TYPE (ll_arg) == TREE_TYPE (rl_arg)
> @@ -5190,7 +5210,8 @@ fold_truthop (location_t loc, enum tree_
> ? ? ?fail. ?However, we can convert a one-bit comparison against zero into
> ? ? ?the opposite comparison against that bit being set in the field. ?*/
>
> - ?wanted_code = (code == TRUTH_AND_EXPR ? EQ_EXPR : NE_EXPR);
> + ?wanted_code = ((code == TRUTH_AND_EXPR || code == BIT_AND_EXPR)
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? EQ_EXPR : NE_EXPR);
> ? if (lcode != wanted_code)
> ? ? {
> ? ? ? if (l_const && integer_zerop (l_const) && integer_pow2p (ll_mask))
> @@ -9324,6 +9345,105 @@ get_pointer_modulus_and_residue (tree ex
> ? return 1;
> ?}
>
> +/* Fold a binary bitwise/truth expression of code CODE and type TYPE
> with operands
> + ? OP0 and OP1. ?LOC is the location of the resulting expression.
> + ? ARG0 and ARG1 are the NOP_STRIPed results of OP0 and OP1.
> + ? Return the folded expression if folding is successful. ?Otherwise,
> + ? return NULL_TREE. ?*/
> +
> +static tree
> +fold_truth_andor (location_t loc, enum tree_code code, tree type,
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? tree arg0, tree arg1, tree op0, tree op1)
> +{
> + ?tree tem;
> +
> + ?/* We only do these simplifications if we are optimizing. ?*/
> + ?if (!optimize)
> + ? ?return NULL_TREE;
> + ?/* If code is BIT_AND_EXPR or BIT_IOR_EXPR, type precision has to be one. ?*/
> + ?if ((code == BIT_AND_EXPR || code == BIT_IOR_EXPR)
> + ? ? ?&& (!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) || TYPE_PRECISION (type) != 1))
> + ? ?return NULL_TREE;
> +
> + ?/* Check for things like (A || B) && (A || C). ?We can convert this
> + ? ? to A || (B && C). ?Note that either operator can be any of the four
> + ? ? truth and/or operations and the transformation will still be
> + ? ? valid. ? Also note that we only care about order for the
> + ? ? ANDIF and ORIF operators. ?If B contains side effects, this
> + ? ? might change the truth-value of A. ?*/
> + ?if (TREE_CODE (arg0) == TREE_CODE (arg1)
> + ? ? ?&& (TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? || TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? || TREE_CODE (arg0) == BIT_AND_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? || TREE_CODE (arg0) == BIT_IOR_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? || TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUTH_AND_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? || TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUTH_OR_EXPR)
> + ? ? ?&& ! TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1)))
> + ? ?{
> + ? ? ?tree a00 = TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0);
> + ? ? ?tree a01 = TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1);
> + ? ? ?tree a10 = TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 0);
> + ? ? ?tree a11 = TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 1);
> + ? ? ?int commutative = ((TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUTH_OR_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? || TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUTH_AND_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? || TREE_CODE (arg0) == BIT_AND_EXPR)
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?&& (code == TRUTH_AND_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|| code == TRUTH_OR_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|| code == BIT_IOR_EXPR));
> +
> + ? ? ?if (operand_equal_p (a00, a10, 0))
> + ? ? ? return fold_build2_loc (loc, TREE_CODE (arg0), type, a00,
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, a01, a11));
> + ? ? ?else if (commutative && operand_equal_p (a00, a11, 0))
> + ? ? ? return fold_build2_loc (loc, TREE_CODE (arg0), type, a00,
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, a01, a10));
> + ? ? ?else if (commutative && operand_equal_p (a01, a10, 0))
> + ? ? ? return fold_build2_loc (loc, TREE_CODE (arg0), type, a01,
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, a00, a11));
> +
> + ? ? ?/* This case if tricky because we must either have commutative
> + ? ? ? ?operators or else A10 must not have side-effects. ?*/
> +
> + ? ? ?else if ((commutative || ! TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (a10))
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ?&& operand_equal_p (a01, a11, 0))
> + ? ? ? return fold_build2_loc (loc, TREE_CODE (arg0), type,
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, a00, a10),
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? a01);
> + ? ?}
> +
> + ?/* See if we can build a range comparison. */
> + ?if (0 != (tem = fold_range_test (loc, code, type, op0, op1)))
> + ? ?return tem;
> +
> + ?if ((code == TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR && TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR)
> + ? ? ?|| (code == TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR && TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR))
> + ? ?{
> + ? ? ?tem = merge_truthop_with_opposite_arm (loc, arg0, arg1, true);
> + ? ? ?if (tem)
> + ? ? ? return fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, tem, arg1);
> + ? ?}
> +
> + ?if ((code == TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR && TREE_CODE (arg1) == TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR)
> + ? ? ?|| (code == TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR && TREE_CODE (arg1) == TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR))
> + ? ?{
> + ? ? ?tem = merge_truthop_with_opposite_arm (loc, arg1, arg0, false);
> + ? ? ?if (tem)
> + ? ? ? return fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, arg0, tem);
> + ? ?}
> +
> + ?/* Check for the possibility of merging component references. ?If our
> + ? ? lhs is another similar operation, try to merge its rhs with our
> + ? ? rhs. ?Then try to merge our lhs and rhs. ?*/
> + ?if (TREE_CODE (arg0) == code
> + ? ? ?&& 0 != (tem = fold_truthop (loc, code, type,
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1), arg1)))
> + ? ?return fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0), tem);
> +
> + ?if ((tem = fold_truthop (loc, code, type, arg0, arg1)) != 0)
> + ? ?return tem;
> +
> + ?return NULL_TREE;
> +}
>
> ?/* Fold a binary expression of code CODE and type TYPE with operands
> ? ?OP0 and OP1. ?LOC is the location of the resulting expression.
> @@ -9424,21 +9544,42 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc,
>
> ? if ((code == BIT_AND_EXPR || code == BIT_IOR_EXPR
> ? ? ? ?|| code == EQ_EXPR || code == NE_EXPR)
> - ? ? ?&& ((truth_value_p (TREE_CODE (arg0))
> - ? ? ? ? ?&& (truth_value_p (TREE_CODE (arg1))
> + ? ? ?&& (!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) || TYPE_PRECISION (type) != 1)
> + ? ? ?&& ((truth_value_type_p (TREE_CODE (arg0), TREE_TYPE (arg0))
> + ? ? ? ? ?&& (truth_value_type_p (TREE_CODE (arg1), TREE_TYPE (arg1))
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? || (TREE_CODE (arg1) == BIT_AND_EXPR
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? && integer_onep (TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 1)))))
> - ? ? ? ? || (truth_value_p (TREE_CODE (arg1))
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? && (truth_value_p (TREE_CODE (arg0))
> + ? ? ? ? || (truth_value_type_p (TREE_CODE (arg1), TREE_TYPE (arg1))
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? && (truth_value_type_p (TREE_CODE (arg0), TREE_TYPE (arg0))
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|| (TREE_CODE (arg0) == BIT_AND_EXPR
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?&& integer_onep (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1)))))))
> ? ? {
> ? ? ? tem = fold_build2_loc (loc, code == BIT_AND_EXPR ? TRUTH_AND_EXPR
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?: code == BIT_IOR_EXPR ? TRUTH_OR_EXPR
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?: TRUTH_XOR_EXPR,
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?boolean_type_node,
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?fold_convert_loc (loc, boolean_type_node, arg0),
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?fold_convert_loc (loc, boolean_type_node, arg1));
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?: code == BIT_IOR_EXPR ? TRUTH_OR_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?: TRUTH_XOR_EXPR,
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?boolean_type_node,
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?fold_convert_loc (loc, boolean_type_node, arg0),
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?fold_convert_loc (loc, boolean_type_node, arg1));
> +
> + ? ? ?if (code == EQ_EXPR)
> + ? ? ? tem = invert_truthvalue_loc (loc, tem);
> +
> + ? ? ?return fold_convert_loc (loc, type, tem);
> + ? ?}
> + ?if ((code == EQ_EXPR || code == NE_EXPR)
> + ? ? ?&& ((truth_value_type_p (TREE_CODE (arg0), TREE_TYPE (arg0))
> + ? ? ? ? ?&& (truth_value_type_p (TREE_CODE (arg1), TREE_TYPE (arg1))
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|| (TREE_CODE (arg1) == BIT_AND_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?&& integer_onep (TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 1)))))
> + ? ? ? ? || (truth_value_type_p (TREE_CODE (arg1), TREE_TYPE (arg1))
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? && (truth_value_type_p (TREE_CODE (arg0), TREE_TYPE (arg0))
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? || (TREE_CODE (arg0) == BIT_AND_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? && integer_onep (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1)))))))
> + ? ?{
> + ? ? ?tem = fold_build2_loc (loc, BIT_XOR_EXPR,
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?boolean_type_node,
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?fold_convert_loc (loc, boolean_type_node, arg0),
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?fold_convert_loc (loc, boolean_type_node, arg1));
>
> ? ? ? if (code == EQ_EXPR)
> ? ? ? ?tem = invert_truthvalue_loc (loc, tem);
> @@ -10597,6 +10738,57 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc,
> ? ? ? if (operand_equal_p (arg0, arg1, 0))
> ? ? ? ?return non_lvalue_loc (loc, fold_convert_loc (loc, type, arg0));
>
> + ? ? ?if (TYPE_PRECISION (type) == 1 && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type))
> + ? ? ? ?{
> + ? ? ? ? /* If either arg is constant zero, drop it. ?*/
> + ? ? ? ? if (TREE_CODE (arg0) == INTEGER_CST && integer_zerop (arg0))
> + ? ? ? ? ? return non_lvalue_loc (loc, fold_convert_loc (loc, type, arg1));
> + ? ? ? ? if (TREE_CODE (arg1) == INTEGER_CST && integer_zerop (arg1))
> + ? ? ? ? ? return non_lvalue_loc (loc, fold_convert_loc (loc, type, arg0));
> + ? ? ? ? /* If second arg is constant true, result is true, but we must
> + ? ? ? ? ? ?evaluate first arg. ?*/
> + ? ? ? ? if (TREE_CODE (arg1) == INTEGER_CST && ! integer_zerop (arg1))
> + ? ? ? ? ? return omit_one_operand_loc (loc, type, arg1, arg0);
> + ? ? ? ? if (TREE_CODE (arg0) == INTEGER_CST && ! integer_zerop (arg0))
> + ? ? ? ? ? return omit_one_operand_loc (loc, type, arg0, arg1);
> +
> + ? ? ? ? /* !X | X is always true. ?*/
> + ? ? ? ? if ((TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUTH_NOT_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|| TREE_CODE (arg0) == BIT_NOT_EXPR)
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? && operand_equal_p (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0), arg1, 0))
> + ? ? ? ? ? return omit_one_operand_loc (loc, type, integer_one_node, arg1);
> + ? ? ? ? /* X | !X is always true. ?*/
> + ? ? ? ? if ((TREE_CODE (arg1) == TRUTH_NOT_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? || TREE_CODE (arg1) == BIT_NOT_EXPR)
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? && operand_equal_p (arg0, TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 0), 0))
> + ? ? ? ? ? return omit_one_operand_loc (loc, type, integer_one_node, arg0);
> +
> + ? ? ? ? /* (X & !Y) | (!X & Y) is X ^ Y */
> + ? ? ? ? if (TREE_CODE (arg0) == BIT_AND_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? && TREE_CODE (arg1) == BIT_AND_EXPR)
> + ? ? ? ? ? {
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? tree a0, a1, l0, l1, n0, n1;
> +
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? a0 = fold_convert_loc (loc, type, TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 0));
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? a1 = fold_convert_loc (loc, type, TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 1));
> +
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? l0 = fold_convert_loc (loc, type, TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0));
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? l1 = fold_convert_loc (loc, type, TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1));
> +
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? n0 = fold_build1_loc (loc, TRUTH_NOT_EXPR, type, l0);
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? n1 = fold_build1_loc (loc, TRUTH_NOT_EXPR, type, l1);
> +
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if ((operand_equal_p (n0, a0, 0)
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?&& operand_equal_p (n1, a1, 0))
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? || (operand_equal_p (n0, a1, 0)
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? && operand_equal_p (n1, a0, 0)))
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return fold_build2_loc (loc, BIT_XOR_EXPR, type, l0, n1);
> + ? ? ? ? ? }
> + ? ? ? ? tem = fold_truth_andor (loc, code, type, arg0, arg1, op0, op1);
> + ? ? ? ? if (tem)
> + ? ? ? ? ? return tem;
> + ? ? ? ?}
> +
> ? ? ? /* ~X | X is -1. ?*/
> ? ? ? if (TREE_CODE (arg0) == BIT_NOT_EXPR
> ? ? ? ? ?&& operand_equal_p (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0), arg1, 0))
> @@ -10758,6 +10950,24 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc,
> ? ? ? if (operand_equal_p (arg0, arg1, 0))
> ? ? ? ?return omit_one_operand_loc (loc, type, integer_zero_node, arg0);
>
> + ? ? ?if (TYPE_PRECISION (type) == 1 && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type))
> + ? ? ? ?{
> + ? ? ? ? /* If the second arg is constant true, this is a logical inversion. ?*/
> + ? ? ? ? if (integer_onep (arg1))
> + ? ? ? ? ? {
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? tem = invert_truthvalue_loc (loc, arg0);
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? return non_lvalue_loc (loc, fold_convert_loc (loc, type, tem));
> + ? ? ? ? ? }
> + ? ? ? ? /* !X ^ X is always true. ?*/
> + ? ? ? ? if (TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUTH_NOT_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? && operand_equal_p (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0), arg1, 0))
> + ? ? ? ? ? return omit_one_operand_loc (loc, type, integer_one_node, arg1);
> + ? ? ? ? /* X ^ !X is always true. ?*/
> + ? ? ? ? if (TREE_CODE (arg1) == TRUTH_NOT_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? && operand_equal_p (arg0, TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 0), 0))
> + ? ? ? ? ? return omit_one_operand_loc (loc, type, integer_one_node, arg0);
> + ? ? ? }
> +
> ? ? ? /* ~X ^ X is -1. ?*/
> ? ? ? if (TREE_CODE (arg0) == BIT_NOT_EXPR
> ? ? ? ? ?&& operand_equal_p (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0), arg1, 0))
> @@ -10918,6 +11128,61 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc,
> ? ? ? ?return omit_one_operand_loc (loc, type, arg1, arg0);
> ? ? ? if (operand_equal_p (arg0, arg1, 0))
> ? ? ? ?return non_lvalue_loc (loc, fold_convert_loc (loc, type, arg0));
> + ? ? ?/* Note that the operands of this must be ints
> + ? ? ? ?and their values must be 0 or 1.
> + ? ? ? ?("true" is a fixed value perhaps depending on the language.) ?*/
> + ? ? ?/* If first arg is constant zero, return it. ?*/
> + ? ? ?if (integer_zerop (arg0))
> + ? ? ? return fold_convert_loc (loc, type, arg0);
> +
> + ? ? ?if (TYPE_PRECISION (type) == 1 && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type))
> + ? ? ? ?{
> + ? ? ? ? /* If either arg is constant true, drop it. ?*/
> + ? ? ? ? if (TREE_CODE (arg0) == INTEGER_CST && ! integer_zerop (arg0))
> + ? ? ? ? ? return non_lvalue_loc (loc, fold_convert_loc (loc, type, arg1));
> + ? ? ? ? if (TREE_CODE (arg1) == INTEGER_CST && ! integer_zerop (arg1)
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? /* Preserve sequence points. ?*/
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? && (code != TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR || ! TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (arg0)))
> + ? ? ? ? ? return non_lvalue_loc (loc, fold_convert_loc (loc, type, arg0));
> + ? ? ? ? /* If second arg is constant zero, result is zero, but first arg
> + ? ? ? ? ? ?must be evaluated. ?*/
> + ? ? ? ? if (integer_zerop (arg1))
> + ? ? ? ? ? return omit_one_operand_loc (loc, type, arg1, arg0);
> + ? ? ? ? /* Likewise for first arg, but note that only the TRUTH_AND_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? ? ?case will be handled here. ?*/
> + ? ? ? ? if (integer_zerop (arg0))
> + ? ? ? ? ? return omit_one_operand_loc (loc, type, arg0, arg1);
> +
> + ? ? ? ? /* !X && X is always false. ?*/
> + ? ? ? ? if (TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUTH_NOT_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? && operand_equal_p (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0), arg1, 0))
> + ? ? ? ? ? return omit_one_operand_loc (loc, type, integer_zero_node, arg1);
> + ? ? ? ? /* X & !X is always false. ?*/
> + ? ? ? ? if (TREE_CODE (arg1) == TRUTH_NOT_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? && operand_equal_p (arg0, TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 0), 0))
> + ? ? ? ? ? return omit_one_operand_loc (loc, type, integer_zero_node, arg0);
> +
> + ? ? ? ? /* A < X & A + 1 > Y ==> A < X & A >= Y. ?Normally A + 1 > Y
> + ? ? ? ? ? ?means A >= Y & A != MAX, but in this case we know that
> + ? ? ? ? ? ?A < X <= MAX. ?*/
> +
> + ? ? ? ? if (!TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (arg0)
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? && !TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (arg1))
> + ? ? ? ? ? {
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? tem = fold_to_nonsharp_ineq_using_bound (loc, arg0, arg1);
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (tem && !operand_equal_p (tem, arg0, 0))
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, tem, arg1);
> +
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? tem = fold_to_nonsharp_ineq_using_bound (loc, arg1, arg0);
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (tem && !operand_equal_p (tem, arg1, 0))
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, arg0, tem);
> + ? ? ? ? ? }
> +
> + ? ? ? ? tem = fold_truth_andor (loc, code, type, arg0, arg1, op0, op1);
> + ? ? ? ? if (tem)
> + ? ? ? ? ? return tem;
> +
> + ? ? ? }
>
> ? ? ? /* ~X & X, (X == 0) & X, and !X & X are always zero. ?*/
> ? ? ? if ((TREE_CODE (arg0) == BIT_NOT_EXPR
> @@ -12006,86 +12271,11 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc,
> ? ? ? ? ? ?return fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, arg0, tem);
> ? ? ? ?}
>
> - ? ?truth_andor:
> - ? ? ?/* We only do these simplifications if we are optimizing. ?*/
> - ? ? ?if (!optimize)
> - ? ? ? return NULL_TREE;
> -
> - ? ? ?/* Check for things like (A || B) && (A || C). ?We can convert this
> - ? ? ? ?to A || (B && C). ?Note that either operator can be any of the four
> - ? ? ? ?truth and/or operations and the transformation will still be
> - ? ? ? ?valid. ? Also note that we only care about order for the
> - ? ? ? ?ANDIF and ORIF operators. ?If B contains side effects, this
> - ? ? ? ?might change the truth-value of A. ?*/
> - ? ? ?if (TREE_CODE (arg0) == TREE_CODE (arg1)
> - ? ? ? ? && (TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? || TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? || TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUTH_AND_EXPR
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? || TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUTH_OR_EXPR)
> - ? ? ? ? && ! TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1)))
> - ? ? ? {
> - ? ? ? ? tree a00 = TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0);
> - ? ? ? ? tree a01 = TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1);
> - ? ? ? ? tree a10 = TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 0);
> - ? ? ? ? tree a11 = TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 1);
> - ? ? ? ? int commutative = ((TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUTH_OR_EXPR
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? || TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUTH_AND_EXPR)
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?&& (code == TRUTH_AND_EXPR
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|| code == TRUTH_OR_EXPR));
> -
> - ? ? ? ? if (operand_equal_p (a00, a10, 0))
> - ? ? ? ? ? return fold_build2_loc (loc, TREE_CODE (arg0), type, a00,
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, a01, a11));
> - ? ? ? ? else if (commutative && operand_equal_p (a00, a11, 0))
> - ? ? ? ? ? return fold_build2_loc (loc, TREE_CODE (arg0), type, a00,
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, a01, a10));
> - ? ? ? ? else if (commutative && operand_equal_p (a01, a10, 0))
> - ? ? ? ? ? return fold_build2_loc (loc, TREE_CODE (arg0), type, a01,
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, a00, a11));
> -
> - ? ? ? ? /* This case if tricky because we must either have commutative
> - ? ? ? ? ? ?operators or else A10 must not have side-effects. ?*/
> -
> - ? ? ? ? else if ((commutative || ! TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (a10))
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?&& operand_equal_p (a01, a11, 0))
> - ? ? ? ? ? return fold_build2_loc (loc, TREE_CODE (arg0), type,
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, a00, a10),
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? a01);
> - ? ? ? }
> -
> - ? ? ?/* See if we can build a range comparison. ?*/
> - ? ? ?if (0 != (tem = fold_range_test (loc, code, type, op0, op1)))
> - ? ? ? return tem;
> -
> - ? ? ?if ((code == TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR && TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR)
> - ? ? ? ? || (code == TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR && TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR))
> - ? ? ? {
> - ? ? ? ? tem = merge_truthop_with_opposite_arm (loc, arg0, arg1, true);
> - ? ? ? ? if (tem)
> - ? ? ? ? ? return fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, tem, arg1);
> - ? ? ? }
> -
> - ? ? ?if ((code == TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR && TREE_CODE (arg1) == TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR)
> - ? ? ? ? || (code == TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR && TREE_CODE (arg1) == TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR))
> - ? ? ? {
> - ? ? ? ? tem = merge_truthop_with_opposite_arm (loc, arg1, arg0, false);
> - ? ? ? ? if (tem)
> - ? ? ? ? ? return fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, arg0, tem);
> - ? ? ? }
> -
> - ? ? ?/* Check for the possibility of merging component references. ?If our
> - ? ? ? ?lhs is another similar operation, try to merge its rhs with our
> - ? ? ? ?rhs. ?Then try to merge our lhs and rhs. ?*/
> - ? ? ?if (TREE_CODE (arg0) == code
> - ? ? ? ? && 0 != (tem = fold_truthop (loc, code, type,
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1), arg1)))
> - ? ? ? return fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0), tem);
> -
> - ? ? ?if ((tem = fold_truthop (loc, code, type, arg0, arg1)) != 0)
> - ? ? ? return tem;
> + ? ? ?tem = fold_truth_andor (loc, code, type, arg0, arg1, op0, op1);
> + ? ? ?if (tem)
> + ? ? ? ?return tem;
>
> ? ? ? return NULL_TREE;
> -
> ? ? case TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR:
> ? ? ? /* Note that the operands of this must be ints
> ? ? ? ? and their values must be 0 or true.
> @@ -12140,7 +12330,11 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc,
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?&& operand_equal_p (n1, a0, 0)))
> ? ? ? ? ? ?return fold_build2_loc (loc, TRUTH_XOR_EXPR, type, l0, n1);
> ? ? ? ?}
> - ? ? ?goto truth_andor;
> + ? ? ?tem = fold_truth_andor (loc, code, type, arg0, arg1, op0, op1);
> + ? ? ?if (tem)
> + ? ? ? ?return tem;
> +
> + ? ? ?return NULL_TREE;
>
> ? ? case TRUTH_XOR_EXPR:
> ? ? ? /* If the second arg is constant zero, drop it. ?*/
> @@ -13401,7 +13595,7 @@ fold_ternary_loc (location_t loc, enum t
>
> ? ? ? /* If the second operand is simpler than the third, swap them
> ? ? ? ? since that produces better jump optimization results. ?*/
> - ? ? ?if (truth_value_p (TREE_CODE (arg0))
> + ? ? ?if (truth_value_type_p (TREE_CODE (arg0), TREE_TYPE (arg0))
> ? ? ? ? ?&& tree_swap_operands_p (op1, op2, false))
> ? ? ? ?{
> ? ? ? ? ?location_t loc0 = expr_location_or (arg0, loc);
> @@ -13427,7 +13621,7 @@ fold_ternary_loc (location_t loc, enum t
> ? ? ? ? over COND_EXPR in cases such as floating point comparisons. ?*/
> ? ? ? if (integer_zerop (op1)
> ? ? ? ? ?&& integer_onep (op2)
> - ? ? ? ? && truth_value_p (TREE_CODE (arg0)))
> + ? ? ? ? && truth_value_type_p (TREE_CODE (arg0), TREE_TYPE (arg0)))
> ? ? ? ?return pedantic_non_lvalue_loc (loc,
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?fold_convert_loc (loc, type,
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?invert_truthvalue_loc (loc,
> Index: gcc-head/gcc/gimple.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc-head.orig/gcc/gimple.c
> +++ gcc-head/gcc/gimple.c
> @@ -3160,7 +3160,8 @@ canonicalize_cond_expr_cond (tree t)
> ?{
> ? /* Strip conversions around boolean operations. ?*/
> ? if (CONVERT_EXPR_P (t)
> - ? ? ?&& truth_value_p (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0))))
> + ? ? ?&& truth_value_type_p (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0)),
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0))))
> ? ? t = TREE_OPERAND (t, 0);
>
> ? /* For !x use x == 0. ?*/
> Index: gcc-head/gcc/gimplify.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc-head.orig/gcc/gimplify.c
> +++ gcc-head/gcc/gimplify.c
> @@ -2837,7 +2837,7 @@ gimple_boolify (tree expr)
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ?if (TREE_CODE (arg) == NOP_EXPR
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?&& TREE_TYPE (arg) == TREE_TYPE (call))
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?arg = TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0);
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? if (truth_value_p (TREE_CODE (arg)))
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (truth_value_type_p (TREE_CODE (arg), TREE_TYPE (arg)))
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?{
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?arg = gimple_boolify (arg);
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?CALL_EXPR_ARG (call, 0)
> Index: gcc-head/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc-head.orig/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c
> +++ gcc-head/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c
> @@ -4416,7 +4416,8 @@ find_func_aliases (gimple origt)
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? && !POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (rhsop))))
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? || gimple_assign_single_p (t))
> ? ? ? ? ? ?get_constraint_for_rhs (rhsop, &rhsc);
> - ? ? ? ? else if (truth_value_p (code))
> + ? ? ? ? else if (truth_value_type_p (code,
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?TREE_TYPE (lhsop)))
> ? ? ? ? ? ?/* Truth value results are not pointer (parts). ?Or at least
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? very very unreasonable obfuscation of a part. ?*/
> ? ? ? ? ? ?;
> Index: gcc-head/gcc/tree.h
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc-head.orig/gcc/tree.h
> +++ gcc-head/gcc/tree.h
> @@ -5309,13 +5309,22 @@ extern tree combine_comparisons (locatio
> ?extern void debug_fold_checksum (const_tree);
>
> ?/* Return nonzero if CODE is a tree code that represents a truth value. ?*/
> +#define truth_value_p(CODE) ?truth_value_type_p ((CODE), NULL_TREE)
> +
> +/* Return nonzero if CODE is a tree code that represents a truth value.
> + ? If TYPE is an integral type, unsigned, and has precision of one, then
> + ? additionally return for bitwise-binary and bitwise-invert nonzero. ?*/
> ?static inline bool
> -truth_value_p (enum tree_code code)
> +truth_value_type_p (enum tree_code code, tree type)
> ?{
> ? return (TREE_CODE_CLASS (code) == tcc_comparison
> ? ? ? ? ?|| code == TRUTH_AND_EXPR || code == TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR
> ? ? ? ? ?|| code == TRUTH_OR_EXPR || code == TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR
> - ? ? ? ? || code == TRUTH_XOR_EXPR || code == TRUTH_NOT_EXPR);
> + ? ? ? ? || code == TRUTH_XOR_EXPR || code == TRUTH_NOT_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? || ((code == BIT_AND_EXPR || code == BIT_IOR_EXPR
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|| code == BIT_XOR_EXPR || code == BIT_NOT_EXPR)
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? && type && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? && TYPE_PRECISION (type) == 1 && TYPE_UNSIGNED (type)));
> ?}
>
>
> Index: gcc-head/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc-head.orig/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c
> +++ gcc-head/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c
> @@ -1668,7 +1668,7 @@ truth_valued_ssa_name (tree name)
> ? ? return true;
> ? def = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (name);
> ? if (is_gimple_assign (def))
> - ? ?return truth_value_p (gimple_assign_rhs_code (def));
> + ? ?return truth_value_type_p (gimple_assign_rhs_code (def), type);
> ? return false;
> ?}
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]