This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: --enable-gnu-indirect-function patch

From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:02:58 +0100
Subject: Re: --enable-gnu-indirect-function patch
References: <mcrd3hna4wd.fsf@coign.corp.google.com>

On 07/06/11 14:57, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:

This patch:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg02070.html

for x86_64-*-linux* sets the default for --enable-gnu-indirect-function
to "glibc-2011".  This string is not used anywhere else in gcc as far as
I can see.  What is the purpose of that?

I think it's an error on my part, and that x86_64 should behave the same as x86 in this regard, as you say.

nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell

References:
- --enable-gnu-indirect-function patch
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]