This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH [1/n] X32: Add initial -x32 support

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 19:09:05 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: PATCH [1/n] X32: Add initial -x32 support
References: <20110605195441.GA1225@intel.com> <20110705143920.GA25294@intel.com> <CAFULd4ZvcB+kiXRFv+GkM67FZOCYdyOkYEaS61Z8CNh=ENEf-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOoOUrV7rHb1nADYafkcHrK9v3DR3cjGUfOT0Aej6C3=3g@mail.gmail.com> <CAFULd4apUvbT4h6iT=+CincfiyWoKZ28=CngUyr9m0Py5+ooAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOrCWLnyO=hcK2CHajBEoj8XQmx7mCPW-22g87uR3oXxmw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:

> > I really think that "!(m64|mx32)" is more descriptive and clear...
> 
> I don't know if gcc spec supports it.  I just followed mips backend.

Indeed, I don't think any such grouping construct exists in specs.

The .opt changes look fine to me.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

References:
- PATCH [1/n] X32: Add initial -x32 support
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH [1/n] X32: Add initial -x32 support
  - From: Uros Bizjak
- Re: PATCH [1/n] X32: Add initial -x32 support
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH [1/n] X32: Add initial -x32 support
  - From: Uros Bizjak
- Re: PATCH [1/n] X32: Add initial -x32 support
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]