This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Unreviewed build/libgcc, mudflap patches


Hi Iain,

>> The following three patches have remained unreviewed for a week:
>>
>> 	[build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc
>>        http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01452.html
>>
>> This needs at least a build and/or libgcc maintainer, though a global
>> reviewer might be helpful.  I'm not Cc'ing the various affected target
>> or runtime library maintainers here, though unfortunately none of them
>> has commented in any way ;-(
>
> As far as Darwin is concerned, there do not appear to be any problems.
>
> The patch bootstraps on *-darwin9 and x86_64-darwin10 and reg-tested on
> i686-darwin9 with no issues.

great, thanks for testing.

> having said this .. I can neither approve nor reject the patch ;-)

Even so, every bit of assurance that this won't break many platforms helps.

> If you get as far as pushing the .ver files around, then I have some
> tidy-ups I'd like to incorporate (particularly with respect to gcc/
> libgcc-libsystem.ver which is in a funny place, and contains extra  symbols
> that are only used AFAIK by x86 darwin10).

No such plans at the moment: my primary motivation is to deal with
issues that affect platforms I maintain.  While I can test Darwin 9 if
need be, I'd rather restrict my time to my `own' platforms.

	Rainer

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]