This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH (3/7)] Widening multiply-and-accumulate pattern matching
On 24/06/11 16:47, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> > I can certainly add checks to make sure that the skipped operations
>> > actually don't make any important changes to the value, but do I need to?
> Yes.
Ok, I'll go away and do that then.
BTW, I see useless_type_conversion_p, but that's not quite what I want.
Is there an equivalent existing function to determine whether a
conversion changes the logical/arithmetic meaning of a type?
I mean, conversion to a wider mode is not "useless", but it is harmless,
whereas conversion to a narrower mode may truncate the value.
Andrew