This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch, Fortran, OOP] PR 49112: [4.6/4.7 Regression] Missing type-bound procedure, "duplicate save" warnings and internal compiler error
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: Janus Weil <janus at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:15:08 -0700
- Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran, OOP] PR 49112: [4.6/4.7 Regression] Missing type-bound procedure, "duplicate save" warnings and internal compiler error
- References: <BANLkTimik4atfh8Vx5scAfJedWCr1zSCHg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:29:01AM +0200, Janus Weil wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> while I continue working on some of the yet unsolved parts of this PR,
> I'm already posting a simple patch which fixes the part with
> "duplicate save" warnings on CLASS variables (which is a regression on
> 4.6 and trunk). The warnings are silenced by making the vtab and
> default initialization symbols SAVE_IMPLICIT (right now they falsely
> are SAVE_EXPLICIT). This is a pretty obvious fix, and rather safe to
> apply to trunk, I think.
>
> However, I would also like to apply it to the 4.6 branch (which was
> frozen a few hours ago). Is there any chance to get approval by the
> RM's for this?
>
> In any case, the patch was regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. I'll
> commit to trunk as obvious tomorrow.
>
Janus,
You should ping richi or jakub on IRC (#gcc channel). That
being said, I think that it is too late in the process to
include it in 4.6.1.
--
Steve