This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][Revised] Pass -no_pie on SYSTEMSPEC for darwin11

From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
To: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot med dot uc dot edu>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org List" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:40:59 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH][Revised] Pass -no_pie on SYSTEMSPEC for darwin11
References: <20110618024913.GA29537@bromo.med.uc.edu> <8035A572-9078-46F4-9172-8CB269E1E854@comcast.net> <A3F646F4-95BD-40B0-8320-A5976BD3B85A@comcast.net> <20110619194319.GA30493@bromo.med.uc.edu>

On Jun 19, 2011, at 12:43 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Thanks. Can we get this on gcc 4.5.4 as well?

As commented in the PR, I'd have to see a confirmation that the bug exists in gcc-4.5.x _and_ that the patch fixes it (with no regressions).  That had been previously stated for gcc-4.6.x, which is why the backport to 4.6.x.  Sorry in advance if it has already been stated, I might have missed it.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH][Revised] Pass -no_pie on SYSTEMSPEC for darwin11
  - From: Jack Howarth

References:
- [PATCH][Revised] Pass -no_pie on SYSTEMSPEC for darwin11
  - From: Jack Howarth
- Re: [PATCH][Revised] Pass -no_pie on SYSTEMSPEC for darwin11
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: [PATCH][Revised] Pass -no_pie on SYSTEMSPEC for darwin11
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: [PATCH][Revised] Pass -no_pie on SYSTEMSPEC for darwin11
  - From: Jack Howarth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]