Re: [patch] Fix PR tree-optimization/49318

[Ira Rosen <ira dot rosen at linaro dot org>]

On 10 June 2011 12:14, Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Ira Rosen <ira.rosen@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The test in PR 49318 fails because the vectorizer recognizes address
>> computation sequence as a widening-multiplication pattern, while such
>> sequence is not relevant to vectorization. The problem is that the
>> vectorizer doesn't check if a statement is going to be vectorized
>> before replacing it with a pattern. Moreover, the vectorizer first
>> detects the patterns and only after that looks for relevant
>> statements. Changing the order is not a good option, since statements
>> relevance is defined also by their belonging to a pattern.
>>
>> This patch solves the problem by removing pattern statements that were
>> created for statements that are not supposed to be vectorized.
>>
>> Bootstrapped with vectorization enabled on powerpc64-suse-linux and
>> tested on powerpc64-suse-linux and x86_64-suse-linux.
>> Committed.
>
> Ick, yeah. ?I remember running into this ordering issue when doing the
> multi-vector size reorgs...
>
> In the end I think we should not generate the pattern stmt during
> pattern matching but only mark the relevant statements with a
> pattern kind. ?Say, for each pattern we have a "main" statement
> that has related stmts belonging to the pattern that define uses
> of the "main" statement - mark those to refer to that "main" statement.
> For that "main" statement simply record an enum value, like,
> widening_mult. ?Then only at vectorized statement
> generation time actually generate the vectorized form of the
> pattern statement.
>
> Thus, the non-vectorized pattern statements would never be generated.
>
> So, separate analysis and transform more properly.
>
> Of course I didn't get around to implement the above ... (we'd have
> a new vectorizable_pattern worker).

Sounds like a good idea. I'll give it a try.

Thanks,
Ira

>
> Richard.
>
>> Ira
>>
>> ChangeLog:
>>
>> ? ? PR tree-optimization/49318
>> ? ? * tree-vect-loop.c (vect_determine_vectorization_factor):
>> ? ? Remove irrelevant pattern statements.
>>
>> testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> ? ? PR tree-optimization/49318
>> ? ? * gcc.dg/vect/pr49318.c: New test.
>>
>