This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Libiberty: POSIXify psignal definition
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- Cc: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:20:48 +0100
- Subject: Re: Libiberty: POSIXify psignal definition
- References: <20110505073039.GA23122@calimero.vinschen.de> <1305646410.29122.21.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <201105171552.p4HFq4ch009720@greed.delorie.com> <1305648468.29122.25.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20110517163313.GU5248@calimero.vinschen.de> <201105171648.p4HGmiOG011405@greed.delorie.com> <1305740907.29122.60.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <201105181803.p4II3Yth019834@greed.delorie.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1105181919470.31331@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <201105261519.p4QFJcNt030882@greed.delorie.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1106080755380.50291@dair.pair.com>
On 08/06/11 12:56, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2011, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>
>>> Yes please. I've been arguing for that for some time.
>>
>> Since you feel so strongly about it and nobody objects, go ahead.
>
> Backport to open branches? (And note PR48825.)
>
> brgds, H-P
>
>
I think we have to, given that at present this breaks building older
compilers with newer versions of newlib.
R.