This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: explicitely mark out-of-scope deaths

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 16:04:39 +0200
Subject: Re: RFC: explicitely mark out-of-scope deaths
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1105261516240.9668@wotan.suse.de> <BANLkTimbaub=bFhfuz6th4smepoOKxQLMA@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1105271559360.9668@wotan.suse.de>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 03:59:47PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2011, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > > on IRC we discussed about this, here's the RFC patch. ?It bootstraps 
> > > and causes some minor regressions most probably due to some missing 
> > > sprinkled checks for the special clobber insns and sometimes due to 
> > > having to adjust some regexps.
> > 
> >  Just for reference... I am guessing this also supposed to help fix 
> >  PR39604?
> 
> Yep.

And PR49103 etc.

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: explicitely mark out-of-scope deaths
  - From: Michael Matz

References:
- RFC: explicitely mark out-of-scope deaths
  - From: Michael Matz
- Re: RFC: explicitely mark out-of-scope deaths
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: RFC: explicitely mark out-of-scope deaths
  - From: Michael Matz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]