This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH PING] unreviewed tree-slimming patches


On 05/26/2011 09:39 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 10:21 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
>> An alternative solution would be to initialize cur_stmt_list somewhere with an
>> actual 1-element VEC;
> 
> Or just push NULL onto the stack and let append_to_statement_list_1 allocate
> the VEC?

Did you misspeak here?  append_to_statement_1 shouldn't be caring about VECs.
 Or do you mean pushing NULL_TREE someplace else, as in:

>> the check in add_stmt would then be unnecessary, as we'd
>> always be assured of having someplace in the stack to store it.  I don't trust
>> myself to write a patch like that tonight; I'll twiddle with that tomorrow.
> 
> Right, that's what I was thinking about.  I think we should only need to do
> this once per function.

...here?

-Nathan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]