This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH,Fortran] Handle 'q' exponent-letter in real-literal-constant
On Wednesday 27 April 2011 23:10:14 Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:54:37PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 April 2011 01:06:26 Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > It's an 'if -- else if' construct. If gfc_notify_std == FAILURE, then
> > > the error message is issues and the function returns. If it is TRUE,
> > > then there should be no messages and else if() is tested.
> >
> > My concern is that gfc_notify_std seems to return SUCCESS on warnings (I
> > can't test right now as make has decided to rebuild the whole middle-end
> > :-(). Then, I expect double warnings with -pedantic -Wreal-q-constant as
> > -pedantic is a (the only one ?) case outputing warnings for GNU
> > extensions.
> >
> > Mikael
>
> laptop:kargl[220] gfc4x -pedantic -Wreal-q-constant -o z ui.f90
> ui.f90:3.12:
>
> q = 1.23q45
> 1
> Warning: Extension: exponent-letter 'q' in real-literal-constant at (1)
> laptop:kargl[221] gfc4x -pedantic -o z ui.f90
> ui.f90:3.12:
>
> q = 1.23q45
> 1
> Warning: Extension: exponent-letter 'q' in real-literal-constant at (1)
> laptop:kargl[222] gfc4x -Wreal-q-constant -o z ui.f90
> ui.f90:3.12:
>
> q = 1.23q45
> 1
> Warning: Extension: exponent-letter 'q' in real-literal-constant at (1)
Well, that's something odd that I don't want to investigate further.
As it is clean from a user point of view, let's move on.
Mikael