This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: fix up hot/cold partitioning on ports that don't have long conditional branches
- From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
- To: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:28:11 +0200
- Subject: Re: fix up hot/cold partitioning on ports that don't have long conditional branches
- References: <0DF7E8C3-0E32-45F7-AA64-3551505A061A@comcast.net>
> This patch fixes up hot/cold partitioning on ports that don't have long
> conditional branches. I'll note that the entire file has lots of other
> jump optimizations that are suspect.
Do you have a testcase for one of the ports in the tree? Note that parameters
of function must be documented in the head comment. The patch contains long
lines. The ChangeLog entry doesn't look correct (relax_delay_slots mentioned
twice, no mention of the new parameter of follow_jumps, etc). How was the
patch tested? Please generate patches with diff -p.
--
Eric Botcazou