This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
PR target/45074: Check targets of multi-word operations
- From: Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford at googlemail dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 18:26:35 +0100
- Subject: PR target/45074: Check targets of multi-word operations
PR45074 is a case where expand_absneg_bit needs to decompose a
multi-word negation operation into separate word_mode operations.
The target of the operation is a global FP register variable.
For various reasons, CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS forbids changes
from DFmode to SImode for FP registers, so a direct subreg is
not allowed. This in turn causes:
rtx targ_piece = operand_subword (target, i, 1, mode);
to return null, and we segfault on:
if (temp != targ_piece)
emit_move_insn (targ_piece, temp);
This patch adds a multiword_target_p function that tests whether
a given target is suitable for this kind of word_mode decomposition.
I grepped for uses of operand_subword (as opposed to operand_subword_force),
and several use the same:
if (target == 0 || some_other_stuff)
target = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
for (i = 0; i < nwords; i++)
{
rtx targ_piece = operand_subword (target, i, 1, mode);
...
}
idiom. The patch handles those in the same way.
Tested on mips64-linux-gnu. OK to install?
Richard
gcc/
PR target/45074
* optabs.h (multiword_target_p): Declare.
* expmed.c (extract_bit_field_1): Check multiword_target_p when
doing multi-word operations.
* optabs.c (expand_binop): Likewise.
(expand_doubleword_bswap): Likewise.
(expand_absneg_bit): Likewise.
(expand_unop): Likewise.
(expand_copysign_bit): Likewise.
(multiword_target_p): New function.
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/45074
* gcc.target/mips/pr45074.c: New test.
Index: gcc/optabs.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/optabs.h 2011-04-17 12:07:46.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/optabs.h 2011-04-17 12:08:50.000000000 +0100
@@ -1054,6 +1054,8 @@ create_integer_operand (struct expand_op
create_expand_operand (op, EXPAND_INTEGER, GEN_INT (intval), VOIDmode, false);
}
+extern bool multiword_target_p (rtx);
+
extern bool maybe_legitimize_operands (enum insn_code icode,
unsigned int opno, unsigned int nops,
struct expand_operand *ops);
Index: gcc/expmed.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/expmed.c 2011-04-17 12:07:46.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/expmed.c 2011-04-17 12:08:50.000000000 +0100
@@ -1342,7 +1342,7 @@ extract_bit_field_1 (rtx str_rtx, unsign
unsigned int nwords = (bitsize + (BITS_PER_WORD - 1)) / BITS_PER_WORD;
unsigned int i;
- if (target == 0 || !REG_P (target))
+ if (target == 0 || !REG_P (target) || !multiword_target_p (target))
target = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
/* Indicate for flow that the entire target reg is being set. */
Index: gcc/optabs.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/optabs.c 2011-04-17 12:07:46.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/optabs.c 2011-04-17 18:11:58.000000000 +0100
@@ -1605,7 +1605,10 @@ expand_binop (enum machine_mode mode, op
/* If TARGET is the same as one of the operands, the REG_EQUAL note
won't be accurate, so use a new target. */
- if (target == 0 || target == op0 || target == op1)
+ if (target == 0
+ || target == op0
+ || target == op1
+ || !multiword_target_p (target))
target = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
start_sequence ();
@@ -1659,7 +1662,11 @@ expand_binop (enum machine_mode mode, op
opportunities, and second because if target and op0 happen to be MEMs
designating the same location, we would risk clobbering it too early
in the code sequence we generate below. */
- if (target == 0 || target == op0 || target == op1 || ! REG_P (target))
+ if (target == 0
+ || target == op0
+ || target == op1
+ || !REG_P (target)
+ || !multiword_target_p (target))
target = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
start_sequence ();
@@ -2481,7 +2488,7 @@ expand_doubleword_bswap (enum machine_mo
t0 = expand_unop (word_mode, bswap_optab,
operand_subword_force (op, 1, mode), NULL_RTX, true);
- if (target == 0)
+ if (target == 0 || !multiword_target_p (target))
target = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
if (REG_P (target))
emit_clobber (target);
@@ -2724,7 +2731,9 @@ expand_absneg_bit (enum rtx_code code, e
if (code == ABS)
mask = double_int_not (mask);
- if (target == 0 || target == op0)
+ if (target == 0
+ || target == op0
+ || (nwords > 1 && !multiword_target_p (target)))
target = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
if (nwords > 1)
@@ -2915,7 +2924,7 @@ expand_unop (enum machine_mode mode, opt
int i;
rtx insns;
- if (target == 0 || target == op0)
+ if (target == 0 || target == op0 || !multiword_target_p (target))
target = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
start_sequence ();
@@ -3386,7 +3395,10 @@ expand_copysign_bit (enum machine_mode m
mask = double_int_setbit (double_int_zero, bitpos);
- if (target == 0 || target == op0 || target == op1)
+ if (target == 0
+ || target == op0
+ || target == op1
+ || (nwords > 1 && !multiword_target_p (target)))
target = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
if (nwords > 1)
@@ -7001,6 +7013,23 @@ insn_operand_matches (enum insn_code ico
(operand, insn_data[(int) icode].operand[opno].mode)));
}
+/* TARGET is a target of a multiword operation that we are going to
+ implement as a series of word-mode operations. Return true if
+ TARGET is suitable for this purpose. */
+
+bool
+multiword_target_p (rtx target)
+{
+ enum machine_mode mode;
+ int i;
+
+ mode = GET_MODE (target);
+ for (i = 0; i < GET_MODE_SIZE (mode); i += UNITS_PER_WORD)
+ if (!validate_subreg (word_mode, mode, target, i))
+ return false;
+ return true;
+}
+
/* Like maybe_legitimize_operand, but do not change the code of the
current rtx value. */
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/pr45074.c
===================================================================
--- /dev/null 2011-04-17 10:56:28.045573347 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/pr45074.c 2011-04-17 12:08:50.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+/* { dg-options "-mhard-float -mgp32 -O" } */
+register double g __asm__("$f20");
+
+NOMIPS16 void
+test (double a)
+{
+ g = -a;
+}