Re: More of ipa-inline housekeeping

[Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>]

> >
> > I fixed this on the and added sanity check that the fields are initialized.
> > This has shown problem with early inliner iteration fixed thusly and fact that
> > early inliner is attempting to compute overall growth at a time the inline
> > parameters are not computed for functions not visited by early optimizations
> > yet. We previously agreed that early inliner should not try to do that (as this
> > leads to early inliner inlining functions called once that should be deferred
> > for later consieration). ?I just hope it won't cause benchmarks to
> > regress too much ;)
> 
> Yeah, we agreed to that.  And I forgot about it as it wasn't part of the
> early inliner reorg (which was supposed to be a 1:1 transform).

Today C++ results shows some regressions, but nothing earthshaking.  So I think it is good
idea to drop this feature of early inliner since it is not really systematic.
There is also great improvement on LTO SPEC2000, but I tend to hope it is unrelated change.
Perhaps your aliasing?

Honza