This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [testsuite] fix to gcc.target/arm/pr43698.c

From: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana dot radhakrishnan at linaro dot org>
To: Janis Johnson <janisjo at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, ramana dot radhakrishnan at arm dot com
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:16:23 +0100
Subject: Re: [testsuite] fix to gcc.target/arm/pr43698.c
References: <4D9F24B2.5040001@codesourcery.com> <35462F6B-37E7-40B7-A519-B975BC04B0EB@comcast.net> <4DA4A506.2080907@codesourcery.com>

On 12 April 2011 20:16, Janis Johnson <janisjo@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On 04/08/2011 04:37 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
>> On Apr 8, 2011, at 8:07 AM, Janis Johnson wrote:
>>> Test gcc.target/arm/pr43698.c specifies -march=armv7-a and fails
>>> execution for multilibs whose hardware or simulator doesn't support that
>>> architecture.
>>
>> Ideally, I'd like target people to weigh in on target changes, ssa people to weigh in on ssa testcases and so on... ?If they don't approve or reject it soon, I'll weigh in... ?I don't see any reason not to approve it.
>
> Ramana, is this change OK? ?Please look also at a patch for gcc.target/arm/sync-1.c that I submitted right after this one.

This is OK.

cheers
Ramana

References:
- [testsuite] fix to gcc.target/arm/pr43698.c
  - From: Janis Johnson
- Re: [testsuite] fix to gcc.target/arm/pr43698.c
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: [testsuite] fix to gcc.target/arm/pr43698.c
  - From: Janis Johnson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]