This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] allocate combine.c:LOG_LINKS in an obstack

From: Nathan Froyd <froydnj at codesourcery dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 12:33:55 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] allocate combine.c:LOG_LINKS in an obstack
References: <20110404184952.GA5423@nightcrawler> <20110405135941.GA27880@nightcrawler> <20110405182255.GK23480@codesourcery.com> <20110405182820.GC27880@nightcrawler> <BANLkTimobS8SKtzSw8VrVS6hiHUisV8dvQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 12:29:45PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> >> This broke compilation on AUTO_INC_DEC targets. ?Currently putting
> >> together a fix and testing via cross to powerpc-eabispe.
> >
> > ...and here's the patch I'm going to install.
> >
> > ? ? ? ?* combine.c (combine_instructions) [AUTO_INC_DEC]: Declare links
> > ? ? ? ?as an rtx.
> > ? ? ? ?(try_combine) [AUTO_INC_DEC]: Declare a local link rtx.
> >
> 
> I think it caused:
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-04/msg00188.html

Why yes, I believe my patch did cause that message to be sent to
gcc-cvs. :)

Anyway, I have checked in the obvious fix for PR bootstrap/48469.

-Nathan

References:
- [PATCH] allocate combine.c:LOG_LINKS in an alloc_pool
  - From: Nathan Froyd
- Re: [PATCH] allocate combine.c:LOG_LINKS in an obstack
  - From: Nathan Froyd
- Re: [PATCH] allocate combine.c:LOG_LINKS in an obstack
  - From: Nathan Froyd
- Re: [PATCH] allocate combine.c:LOG_LINKS in an obstack
  - From: Nathan Froyd
- Re: [PATCH] allocate combine.c:LOG_LINKS in an obstack
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]