This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][ARM] Discourage use of NEON on Cortex-A8

From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
To: Andrew Stubbs <ams at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, patches at linaro dot org, Bernd Schmidt <bernds at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:22:08 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ARM] Discourage use of NEON on Cortex-A8
References: <4D7CF174.1090608@codesourcery.com> <1300122644.6014.46.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <4D7E5696.9010405@codesourcery.com> <1300126674.6014.49.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <4D88ACB0.8030109@codesourcery.com> <4D88AD45.2010803@codesourcery.com>

On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 14:08 +0000, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> And again, with the patch ...
> 
> On 22/03/11 14:05, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> > On 14/03/11 18:17, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> >  > I think the order should be: not-a8, core-regs, core-regs, only-a8.
> >
> > Ok, how about this?
> >
> > I've tested that it still builds spec2k crafty.
> >
> > Andrew

OK

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH][ARM] Discourage use of NEON on Cortex-A8
  - From: Andrew Stubbs

References:
- [PATCH][ARM] Discourage use of NEON on Cortex-A8
  - From: Andrew Stubbs
- Re: [PATCH][ARM] Discourage use of NEON on Cortex-A8
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: [PATCH][ARM] Discourage use of NEON on Cortex-A8
  - From: Andrew Stubbs
- Re: [PATCH][ARM] Discourage use of NEON on Cortex-A8
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: [PATCH][ARM] Discourage use of NEON on Cortex-A8
  - From: Andrew Stubbs
- Re: [PATCH][ARM] Discourage use of NEON on Cortex-A8
  - From: Andrew Stubbs

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]