This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: fix PR c/48116


On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Tom Tromey wrote:

> It seems ok to me to accept it as a GNU extension.
> But, it still doesn't warn with -std=c89 or -std=c99.
> -pedantic seems too heavy for this, to me.

It is not the function of -std to enable diagnostics for extensions; 
that's the function of -pedantic.  This (returning void expressions from a 
function returning void) is an extension that's standard in C++; it should 
probably be documented as an extension in GNU C if it isn't already 
documented.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]