This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [fortran, doc] Fix doc for LOG intrinsic

From: FX <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
To: gfortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:37:56 +0100
Subject: Re: [fortran, doc] Fix doc for LOG intrinsic
References: <50FFA993-A48F-4DD9-A3FF-62DD7CE990D0@gmail.com> <4D7B489F.10505@net-b.de>

> I am mostly OK, however:
> 
> function
> -@cindex logarithmic
> +@cindex base 10 logarithm function
> 
> I think even when looking for the decadic logarithm (common logarithm), I would look under "L" for logarithm and not under "B" for "base". How about "logarithm function with base 10"? If you want, you could could also add, e.g., common/decadic logarithm to the index.

OK, I kept both "logarithm with base 10" and "base 10 logarithm". Committed the attached patch as rev. 170899.

FX

Attachment: log.diff
Description: Binary data

References:
- [fortran, doc] Fix doc for LOG intrinsic
  - From: FX
- Re: [fortran, doc] Fix doc for LOG intrinsic
  - From: Tobias Burnus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]