This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Drop callee function size limits for IPA inlining

From: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot med dot uc dot edu>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
Cc: Dominique Dhumieres <dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, jh at suse dot de
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:21:00 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Drop callee function size limits for IPA inlining
References: <20110216184132.C50BB3BE18@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1102162038400.17230@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:39:53PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> 
> > Richard,
> > 
> > The patch seems to fix pr45810 (at least most of it) without visible
> > degradation of the other polyhedron tests. Is it really to late to
> > apply it for 4.6? Would it be possible to test it on SPEC?
> 
> Heh, definitely way too late for 4.6!  I'm testing it tonight on
> our usual benchmarks (including SPEC).  We also do not have reached
> conclusion on whether the patch is a good idea.

Richard,
   If it is eventually found to be the correct fix, might this be backported for
gcc 4.6.1?
       Jack

> 
> Btw, performance testing is definitely appreciated!
> 
> Richard.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Drop callee function size limits for IPA inlining
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Drop callee function size limits for IPA inlining
  - From: Dominique Dhumieres
- Re: [PATCH] Drop callee function size limits for IPA inlining
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]