This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFA,doc] libstdc++ FAQ and bug reporting
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Yes. Thanks for making these improvements.
Thanks for looking into this.
For the record, this is the version I applied to the GCC 4.5 branch;
exactly the same contents, just the markup had changed so I needed to
accomodate for that.
Gerald
2011-02-13 Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
* doc/xml/faq.xml: Adjust link to bug database.
Remove old item on broken header files.
Index: doc/xml/faq.xml
===================================================================
--- doc/xml/faq.xml (revision 170111)
+++ doc/xml/faq.xml (working copy)
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@
</para>
<para>
Before reporting a bug, please examine the
- <ulink url="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html";>bugs database</ulink> with the
+ <ulink url="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/";>bugs database</ulink> with the
category set to <quote>g++</quote>.
</para>
</answer>
@@ -848,17 +848,9 @@
</question>
<answer id="a-v2_headers">
<para>
- If you have found an extremely broken header file which is
- causing problems for you, look carefully before submitting a
- "high" priority bug report (which you probably
- shouldn't do anyhow; see the last paragraph of the page
- describing <ulink url="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html";>the GCC
- bug database</ulink>).
- </para>
- <para>
- If the headers are in <filename>${prefix}/include/g++-3</filename>, or
- if the installed library's name looks like
- <filename>libstdc++-2.10.a</filename> or
+ If you are using headers in
+ <filename>${prefix}/include/g++-3</filename>, or if the installed
+ library's name looks like <filename>libstdc++-2.10.a</filename> or
<filename>libstdc++-libc6-2.10.so</filename>, then you are using the
old libstdc++-v2 library, which is nonstandard and
unmaintained. Do not report problems with -v2 to the -v3