This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch, libfortran] PR 47571 Some janitorial cleanup
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: Janne Blomqvist <blomqvist dot janne at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:41:02 -0800
- Subject: Re: [Patch, libfortran] PR 47571 Some janitorial cleanup
- References: <AANLkTim=6rBKGE248cQpWt2+ZqZC+VBHJehFvrU9dV8h@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:23:15PM +0200, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>
> I reviewed the Gfortran time intrinsics, both standard and extensions,
> and AFAIK the only place where a monotonic clock fits the API, and
> where we can expose high resolution, is the SYSTEM_CLOCK intrinsic.
>
I suppose that there is some subtle reason that I do not
see. But, why should cpu_time() lack high resolution
if it is available?
--
Steve